This article is the third chapter in our four-part series on the end of legacy IAM and the rise of IAM 3.0. The cracks in the old platform fortress are no longer subtle, they’re gaping. Monolithic identity platforms that once promised control have become liabilities, too rigid to adapt, too slow to respond, and too costly to maintain. In an age defined by APIs, bots, and AI-driven non-human identities, the idea of a single vendor walling off your enterprise is not just outdated, it’s dangerous.
Survival now demands a different approach: not castles, but fabrics. Identity woven together through modular, best-of-breed components, orchestrated in real time to deliver both security and agility. This is the shift from defense to adaptation, from static walls to living systems. Every day spent clinging to the fortress model is another day attackers exploit blind spots you can’t afford.
The breaches are here, the regulations are on the horizon, and the time to re-architect is now. In this chapter, we explore how the IAM fabric, woven through visual orchestration, offers the only path forward. At the end of this article, you’ll find a link to reserve a copy of my upcoming book, "Ghosts in the Machine: The New Age of Identity," a gift from Identity Fusion to you, to dive deeper into what true modernization means.
For decades, IAM vendors sold us castles. Massive, monolithic platforms that promised to house everything under one roof: single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, provisioning, governance, directory services, privileged access, customer identity, the works. Buy once, deploy everywhere, sleep easy.
It was a comforting fantasy - and a dangerous one.
The reality was always messier. Integration projects stretched for years. Upgrades broke fragile connections. Custom code accumulated like weeds in the cracks of stone. Enterprises found themselves locked inside their own fortresses, unable to adapt while attackers simply walked around the walls.
Today, the platform fortress model is obsolete. The modern enterprise doesn’t need another castle. It needs a fabric - modular, orchestrated, adaptive, woven from best-of-breed components.
Let’s rewind. In the 2000s and early 2010s, IAM was fragmented. One tool for SSO. Another for provisioning. Another for privileged access. Auditors groaned. CISOs complained. CFOs watched costs pile up.
Enter the “all-in-one IAM suite.” Vendors promised consolidation. One vendor. One platform. One bill. One platform fortress to defend the kingdom.
For a time, it seemed reasonable. The workforce was still mostly on-premises. Applications were fewer and centralized. Attackers were less sophisticated. The fortress model gave executives a sense of order and control.
But control was an illusion. The monoliths were too rigid, too slow, too inward-looking. As the cloud, APIs, and AI transformed the landscape, fortress IAM became a liability. And licenses kept becoming more expensive even though innovative updates were rare.
There are five fatal flaws in fortress IAM:
The result? Fortresses crumble not under siege but under their own weight.
Enter the fabric.
A fabric is not a single wall. It is a weave , a collection of modular, best in class, IAM components (IGA, PAM, CIAM, API security, behavioral analytics) stitched together by modern visual orchestration. Each module does what it does best. The orchestration layer ensures they operate in harmony. Orchestration frees you from vendor lock-in. However, it also allows the vendor to innovate more freely since the orchestration layer ensures ease of upgrades. Now all they offer can strive to best-in-class stature.
Think of it like a tapestry: each thread alone is weak, but woven together, they form something strong, flexible, and resilient.
Where the fortress centralizes power in a highly customized platform, the fabric distributes it. Where the fortress resists change, the fabric thrives on it. Where the fortress isolates, the fabric connects.
If the fabric is the symphony, orchestration is the conductor.
An orchestration engine sits above the modules, managing identity flows in real time. It decides:
For example, a user logs into a banking portal. Orchestration triggers:
All without the user ever knowing that multiple tools are at play.
This is not theoretical. Modern orchestration tools like Thales Visual Orchestration, Monokee, and Okta Workflows are already proving the orchestration value.
The advantages are stark:
A global bank faced a common dilemma. Its monolithic IAM platform was slow, clunky, and ill-suited for customer-facing applications. The vendor was very slow introducing modern updates. Fraud rates were rising. Customers were defecting due to downtime and friction.
The bank moved to a fabric approach with multiple vendors:
The result: fraud losses dropped, customer experience improved, and compliance audits were smoother. The bank could swap modules as needed without re-architecting. The fortress had been replaced with a living fabric based on visual orchestration.
The move to fabric IAM isn’t just technical. It’s cultural.
Executives must shed the illusion of “one platform to rule them all.” They must embrace modularity, knowing that different modules will evolve at different speeds. The role of orchestration is to harmonize the differences, not erase them.
This mindset aligns with the broader shift to composable enterprise architectures. Just as microservices replaced monolithic apps, fabric IAM replaces fortress IAM.
Today’s orchestration engines are rule-driven. Tomorrow’s will be AI-informed.
Imagine orchestration that:
This is not far off. Several vendors are already experimenting with machine learning inside orchestration. In time, orchestration itself will become an intelligent layer - less conductor, more composer.
No paradigm shift comes without friction. Critics of the fabric model raise concerns:
CFOs and boards want proof. The numbers don’t lie:
The ROI is measured not just in reduced breach costs but in faster time-to-market, improved customer retention, and lower operational overhead.
Fortresses embody defense: build walls, hold ground, resist change. Fabrics embody adaptation: weave, adjust, flex, evolve.
The shift from platform fortress to fabric reflects a larger truth about cybersecurity in the AI era: survival belongs not to the strongest, but to the most adaptable.
The enterprises that cling to platform fortress thinking will be paralyzed by rigidity. The ones that weave fabrics will flow with change, absorbing shocks and evolving ahead of threats.
The story of IAM is the story of evolution. Fortresses had their time. They offered order when the world was simpler. But complexity has outpaced them. APIs, bots, agentic AI - they demand flexibility, not rigidity.
The future of IAM is a fabric: modular, orchestrated, adaptive, alive.
The question for leaders isn’t whether the fortress will fall. It already has. The question is whether you’ll be standing outside the rubble - or weaving the fabric that takes its place.
Reserve Your Free Copy of "Ghosts in the Machine: The New Age of Identity"
The Death of the Old Guard: Why Todays Identity and Access Management Can't Survive the AI Age